ArticleNational science review2026
Reconstructing vegetation biomass in the Middle Jurassic Yanliao Biota from insect fossil assemblages.
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying vegetation biomass is essential for understanding the structure and energy balance of terrestrial ecosystems, yet robust estimates for deep-time ecosystems remain elusive. Most palaeovegetation proxies provide qualitative or relative signals but lack a direct connection to ecosystem-scale energetics. Here, we present a probabilistic framework to reconstruct ancient vegetation biomass using fossil insect assemblages, treating insect biomass as a primary energy-based state variable. We estimated individual insect body mass from fossil morphological traits of insect fossils using relationships calibrated with modern insects, and inferred population densities based on metabolic scaling theory. These estimates were integrated to reconstruct fossil insect community biomass while explicitly accounting for sampling bias. Herbivorous insect biomass was then translated into vegetation biomass through a trophic transfer model incorporating realistic ranges of feeding rates, trophic efficiencies, and biomass accumulation ratios. All uncertainties were implemented by Monte Carlo simulations to generate full probability distributions of vegetation biomass. Sensitivity analyses reveal that insect biomass is the dominant contributor to variance in reconstructed vegetation biomass, with standardized regression coefficients substantially exceeding those of trophic transfer parameters. Ecological parameters primarily modulate vegetation biomass within constrained bounds but do not determine its order of magnitude. Comparisons with modern global vegetation datasets indicate that the reconstructed biomass corresponds to productive terrestrial ecosystems with identifiable modern biome analogues. Our results demonstrate that fossil insect assemblages encode fundamental energy-based constraints of ancient ecosystems and provide a quantitative pathway for reconstructing palaeovegetation biomass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.