Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy of different nerve block techniques with liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic partial lung resection.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare postoperative analgesia efficacy between liposomal bupivacaine-administered thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB) and thoracoscopic direct intercostal nerve blockade (INB) in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for partial lung resection. Methods: A randomized controlled design enrolled 60 elective surgery patients, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to TPVB or INB groups. TPVB received 133 mg liposomal bupivacaine (20 mL) via ultrasound-guided T4 injection; INB got the same dose via thoracoscopic-guided 3rd-7th intercostal injection. Primary endpoint: 72-h postoperative VAS scores at rest/coughing. Secondary outcomes: sufentanil use, PCIA presses, rescue analgesics, complications, and 1-6 month chest pain NRS scores. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. No significant differences in VAS scores at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, or 72 h (all Conclusion: For uniportal VATS, liposomal bupivacaine administered via TPVB or INB showed no statistically significant differences at the primary 6-h assessment or subsequent time points in early analgesia, safety, or long-term chronic pain impact. Pain scores were low in both groups throughout the 72-h period. However, the results do not establish equivalence between the two approaches, and as this trial compared two active interventions without a placebo arm, the absolute analgesic efficacy of each technique cannot be independently determined. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=206795, ChiCTR2300075637.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.