ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Role of radiotherapy in refractory/relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy.
Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) remains a complex therapeutic challenge despite major advances in systemic treatment. Salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for eligible patients, but contemporary pre-transplant strategies increasingly incorporate brentuximab vedotin (BV) and, more recently, PD-1 inhibitors, which have reshaped the salvage landscape and challenged chemotherapy-only approaches. In this evolving context, radiotherapy (RT) continues to play an important role, although its indications have become more selective and individualized. Available data suggest that RT is particularly relevant for local control of residual disease, limited relapse, or metabolically active lesions, especially in the peri-transplant setting and after novel agents. Peri-transplant RT appears most useful in patients at high risk of locoregional relapse, including those with bulky disease, primary refractory lymphoma, residual PET positivity, or incomplete response before ASCT. By contrast, evidence supporting RT after or in combination with novel agents remains limited, largely derived from small, retrospective studies. Data on RT after BV are scarce but suggest excellent local control in carefully selected patients, while the combination of RT and PD-1 blockade appears especially promising, with encouraging efficacy signals from case reports, retrospective series, and recent prospective pediatric/AYA data. Modern RT techniques (IMRT/VMAT, IGRT, DIBH, and involved-site RT) enable response-adapted treatment delivery with improved normal tissue sparing. Overall, RT remains a valuable component of salvage strategies in R/R cHL in the era of BV and PD-1 inhibitors, but prospective studies are needed to better define patient selection, sequencing, target volumes, and dose prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.