ArticleToxicology reports2026
Comparison of effects of charcoal versus electric heating of waterpipe tobacco on carbon monoxide levels: Cardiovascular measures; benzene, pyrene, and nicotine uptake; and subjective reactions.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Toxicants are released from charcoal burned to heat waterpipe tobacco (WPT) and from WPT itself. This natural home setting trial tested a strategy to reduce harm of WPT use by comparing the effects of charcoal versus electric heating of WPT on outcome measures of toxicity. Fifty WPT smokers and 25 non-smokers (controls) participated. Within-subjects measures were collected in charcoal heated and in electric heated WPT smoking sessions. Pre-to-post differences in levels of ambient carbon monoxide (CO), exhaled CO, and heart rate were significantly lower when WPT was electrically heated; there were no differences for urinary biomarkers of nicotine, benzene and pyrene uptake. Comparing levels of controls to post smoking levels of urinary biomarkers of exposure to WPT indicated that electric heating of WPT versus charcoal heating did not significantly reduce exposure to the addictive drug nicotine or the toxicant pyrene, but did significantly reduce exposure to the carcinogenic compound benzene. Furthermore, we found visual evidence of charred WPT from electric sessions, suggesting excessively heated WPT. Participants reported smoking electric-heated WPT was less appealing; harsher and hurt their throat; but healthier and cleaner. To prevent negative subjective reactions from smokers and potential adverse health effects, electric heating devices should be regulated to prevent overheating and excessive thermal degradation of WPT. The findings also inform a harm reduction strategy, particularly for children living in homes of WPT smokers: smokers who use burning charcoal to heat WPT should avoid smoking indoors, as ambient CO levels proved significantly higher indoors than outdoors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.