ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026
Analgesia and sedation practice in children in intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: A survey.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the contemporary practice of analgesia and sedation in children in intensive care units (ICU) in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). Design: A unit level survey. Setting: ICUs in Australia and New Zealand between December 2024 and May 2025. Participants: ICUs that admit more than 150 children annually and report data to the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry. Main outcome measures: Protocols for analgesia, sedation, delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) as well as medication preferences and quality initiatives related to analgesia and sedation. Results: Fourteen of the 16 eligible ICUs completed the survey. Analgesia and sedation protocols were reported by seven tertiary paediatric ICUs (7/9) compared to two general units (adult/paediatric and combined neonatal/paediatric ICUs) (2/5). The preferred first line analgesic was morphine, and first line sedative was dexmedetomidine, however reported sedative preferences varied. Protocolised pain assessment tools were universally reported, sedation assessments were reported in 13/14 units, iatrogenic withdrawal assessments in 12/14 units and less than half (6/14) reported protocolised delirium assessment. Protocols for neuromuscular blocking agent use were also reported in 6/14 ICUs. Multidisciplinary quality assurance groups were infrequent (4/14 ICUs). Conclusions: Paediatric analgesia and sedation protocols were reported in nearly two-thirds of ICUs in ANZ that care for children and more commonly in tertiary PICUs. Analgesia, sedation and drug withdrawal protocolisation were common however, less so for delirium. Despite the multiple components of analgesia and sedation management, governance and quality assurance programs were uncommon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.