Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388440›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026

Evaluation of the clinical impact of different telemedicine practices in intensive care units: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial (TELESCOPE 2): Study protocol.

Adriano José Pereira, Bruna Gomes Barbeiro, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Maura Cristina Dos Santos, Thiago Domingos Corrêa, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Ary Serpa Neto, Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti, Fernando G Zampieri, Guilherme de Paula Pinto Schettino and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Adriano José PereiraEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Gomes BarbeiroEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Tiago Mendonça Dos SantosEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maura Cristina Dos SantosEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thiago Domingos CorrêaEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiInstituto de Pesquisa do Hcor, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ary Serpa NetoEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Sartorato PedrottiEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fernando G ZampieriEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme de Paula Pinto SchettinoEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jorge Ibrain Figueira SalluhBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Utino TaniguchiHospital das Clínicas FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo José Rolim FerrazEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Luciano Cesar AzevedoEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Otávio BerwangerEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Regis Goulart RosaBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Albaladejo MorbeckEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rodrigo BiondiHospital Brasília - Unidade Lago Sul (Rede Américas), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Suzana Margareth LoboHospital de Base de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Renato Carneiro de Freitas ChavesEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Otavio RanzaniEinstein Hospital Israelita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The safety and feasibility of telemedicine in intensive care units (ICU) are well established. However, whether tele-ICU exerts a measurable impact on clinically relevant outcomes remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether a multifaceted Tele-ICU intervention, integrating intensivist-led daily multidisciplinary rounds (DMRs), coordinated care from a multidisciplinary team, and a quality and safety management strategy focused on quality improvement can reduce ICU length of stay among patients in Brazil. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is ICU length of stay. Secondary outcomes include ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days during the first 28 days, ICU readmission within 48 h, early reintubation, ventilator-associated events, and accidental extubation rate. Results: The TELESCOPE 2 study will assess whether a muiltifaceted Tele-ICU intervention can reduce ICU lenght of stay among critically ill patients in Brazil. Conclusion: We describe the study protocol for the TELESCOPE 2 trial, finalized prior to database lock. TELESCOPE 2 will evaluate the clinical impact of a structured Tele-ICU intervention in resource-variable ICUs and may provide robust evidence regarding the optimal model for delivering Tele-ICU.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomesCritical careIntensive care unitsQuality improvementTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42388440
PMCPMC13318551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.