ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
Refining drug screening with automated home cage monitoring: a crossover study in socially housed rats.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attrition in drug development due to central nervous system (CNS)-related adverse events is costly and can pose risks to volunteer safety during clinical development, underscoring the need to refine preclinical CNS screening strategies. The primary preclinical method to assess CNS risk is the Functional Observation Battery (FOB)/Irwin; however, these tests are limited by subjective assessment and restricted temporal resolution. Automated neurobehavioral assessment, such as the Home Cage Analyzer (HCA), may provide a solution to these challenges. Moreover, home cage assessments are in alignment with the 3Rs principles of refinement and reduction of animal use. Here, we detail our efforts to validate the HCA as part of GSK's CNS safety assessment strategy. To this end, we evaluated the HCA using tool compounds-amphetamine, diazepam, and chlorpromazine-each with differing pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. Additionally, we employed a 4 × 4 Latin-square crossover study design allowing each animal to serve as its own control. Our results demonstrate that the HCA captured the expected pharmacological effects of stimulant and sedative compounds across differing light phases. Notably, at the highest amphetamine dose, we observed a distinct shift in behavior: horizontal locomotor activity decreased, vertical rearing activity markedly increased, a nuanced effect that could be missed by traditional observational methods and highlights the value of multimodal assessment. Together, these data strongly support the use of the HCA as a first-line tool in preclinical CNS safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.