Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388424›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026

Refining drug screening with automated home cage monitoring: a crossover study in socially housed rats.

David A Connor, Brady Nifong, Jason D Payseur, XueJun Wu, Eric I Rossman, Ajeesh Koshy Cherian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A ConnorSafety Pharmacology, GSK, Collegeville, PA, United States.
Brady NifongResearch Statistics, GSK, Collegeville, PA, United States.
Jason D PayseurSafety Pharmacology, GSK, Collegeville, PA, United States.
XueJun WuSafety Pharmacology, GSK, Collegeville, PA, United States.
Eric I RossmanSafety Pharmacology, GSK, Collegeville, PA, United States.
Ajeesh Koshy CherianSafety Pharmacology, GSK, Collegeville, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attrition in drug development due to central nervous system (CNS)-related adverse events is costly and can pose risks to volunteer safety during clinical development, underscoring the need to refine preclinical CNS screening strategies. The primary preclinical method to assess CNS risk is the Functional Observation Battery (FOB)/Irwin; however, these tests are limited by subjective assessment and restricted temporal resolution. Automated neurobehavioral assessment, such as the Home Cage Analyzer (HCA), may provide a solution to these challenges. Moreover, home cage assessments are in alignment with the 3Rs principles of refinement and reduction of animal use. Here, we detail our efforts to validate the HCA as part of GSK's CNS safety assessment strategy. To this end, we evaluated the HCA using tool compounds-amphetamine, diazepam, and chlorpromazine-each with differing pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. Additionally, we employed a 4 × 4 Latin-square crossover study design allowing each animal to serve as its own control. Our results demonstrate that the HCA captured the expected pharmacological effects of stimulant and sedative compounds across differing light phases. Notably, at the highest amphetamine dose, we observed a distinct shift in behavior: horizontal locomotor activity decreased, vertical rearing activity markedly increased, a nuanced effect that could be missed by traditional observational methods and highlights the value of multimodal assessment. Together, these data strongly support the use of the HCA as a first-line tool in preclinical CNS safety assessment.

Indexed as

automated home cage monitoringbehavioral pharmacologycentral nervous system (CNS)home cage analyzer (HCA)in vivo CNS screeningLatin-square crossover designsafety pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID42388424
PMCPMC13322677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.