Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388378›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026

From plots to commercial fields: scalable, transferable cotton morphology and productivity estimation using functional growth proxies from UAV and PlanetScope time series.

Francesca Devoto, Michael Bange, Carlos Camino, William Woodgate, Scott Chapman, Andries Potgieter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca DevotoQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael BangeCotton Seed Distributors Ltd, Wee Waa, NSW, Australia.
Carlos CaminoLab. Geo-information Science and Remote Sensing. Wageningen University, Netherlands.
William WoodgateSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Australia.
Scott ChapmanSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Andries PotgieterQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Product demand and climate variability are progressively increasing the need for real-time, scalable crop monitoring to support varietal selection and in-season input optimisation. However, producers still have limited information on the temporal and spatial variability of cotton health and performance beyond point-scale field surveying. In addition, given cotton's high phenotypic plasticity, near real-time derived metrics are essential to improve input efficiency and strengthen long-term sustainability of the cotton industry in Australia. Therefore, we proposed a functional integrated predictive sensing framework to estimate and predict cotton canopy morphological (i.e., height) and productivity traits (i.e., dry matter and lint yield) across large plots (12m × 6m). Scalability was validated by applying the proposed framework to estimate and map cotton yield across commercial fields. To do this, we explored the accuracy of high-resolution multispectral imagery from two platforms (unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and PlanetScope (PS)) collected across two 144-plot trials for two cotton seasons. These were designed with a large range in nitrogen rates (N), shading, and two growth-regulator doses, thus, creating variable environments. Sensing metrics were obtained from UAV imagery (1.3-1.6 cm pixel size) acquired once in 2022/23 and eight times in 2023/24, while PS composites (3 m pixel size) provided near-daily coverage in both seasons. Time-series gaps were imputed using Savitzky-Golay smoothing in thermal time (GDD), enabling extraction of growth dynamic metrics (GDMs) as single-date (SD; e.g., peak canopy) and multi-date (MD; e.g., daily average growth rate) metrics. After reducing collinearity and dimensionality, random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and gaussian process regression (GPR) were trained and interpreted with SHAP, for feature contribution. UAV single-date models (SD_ UAV) achieved strong accuracy for height (R

Indexed as

Multispectral UAV and high-resolution satellite imagingOperational and scalable sensing frameworkRemote sensing growth proxiesSingle and multi-date growth dynamic metrics

Identifiers

PMID42388378
PMCPMC13320494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.