ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
A Preliminary Efficiency Evaluation of Upper Abdominal Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Following Personalized Screening Using Active Breathing Coordinator.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Assisted breath-hold (BH) is a motion management strategy facilitating safe dose-escalated radiation therapy. Treatment efficiency largely depends on patient training and BH capability, which are crucial for the viability of routine BH treatments. Although strategies to extend BH time exist, the efficiency of upper abdominal radiation using the Active Breathing Coordinator remains unreported. The aim of this prospective study was to undertake a novel evaluation of BH efficiency following personalized technique screening. Methods and Materials: Patients presenting for radiation therapy to the upper abdomen, including liver, kidney, pancreas, or adrenal gland, were approached for inclusion. Participants underwent screening to personalize the selection of the BH technique with a prespecified novel decision support algorithm using the Active Breathing Coordinator. BH time, treatment time, and number of BHs were recorded for the first three treatment fractions and used to calculate BH efficiency. Results: Sixteen patients underwent treatment following screening and assessment to personalize their BH technique selection. The overall mean BH time was 22.8 (range, 15-30) seconds, and a mean of 10 (range, 5-18) BHs were required to complete each fraction. Descriptive statistics, including Student Conclusions: Efficiency improved with increasing BH time. Efforts to improve BH time, such as comprehensive training programs, may aid in achieving the maximum benefit of BH techniques.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.