Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388296›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

A European framework for the assessment of digital health technologies: conceptual advances, challenges, and future directions.

Chiara de Waure, Ilaria Valentini, Nicolò Scarsi, Wija Oortwijn, Zoe Garrett, Iga Lipska, Rossella Di Bidino, Emmanouil Tsiasiotis, Americo Cicchetti, Dario Sacchini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chiara de WaureDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Ilaria ValentiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Nicolò ScarsiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Wija OortwijnIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Zoe GarrettNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Iga LipskaHealth Policy Institute, Gdańsk, Poland.
Rossella Di BidinoThe Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Emmanouil TsiasiotisThe Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Americo CicchettiThe Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Dario SacchiniFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technologies (DHTs) are transforming healthcare by enabling for example new care models, improving patient access and engagement, and streamlining healthcare workflows. They have the potential to increase efficiency, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance the overall quality of care. However, across Europe, DHTs evaluation frameworks remain fragmented, and while new approaches continue to emerge, they often focus on specific types of DHTs or particular stages of the product lifecycle. Moreover, traditional Health Technology Assessment (HTA) frameworks have been developed mostly to evaluate medicinal products, which may limit their applicability to DHTs, ultimately constraining health systems' ability to capture DHTs' added value. The European Digital Health Technology Assessment (EDiHTA) is a EU-funded project, which started in January 2024 to co-create an HTA framework for DHTs in order to face these challenges. It is aimed at co-developing together with different key stakeholders a comprehensive and flexible assessment framework tailored to different DHTs, applicable across DHTs lifecycle and across EU member states. In this perspective article, we present our concept design that is being used as foundation of the development of the EDiHTA framework, and we address current challenges in the assessment of DHTs, and the opportunities that lie ahead.

Indexed as

digital health implementationdigital health technologiesEDiHTA frameworkEU-funded projecthealth technology assessment

Identifiers

PMID42388296
PMCPMC13319043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.