ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Digital epidemiology and public health surveillance: scientometric mapping of emerging technologies and challenges (2000-2025).
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of digital technologies has transformed traditional mechanisms of epidemiological surveillance and response, giving rise to an interdisciplinary field known as digital epidemiology. This study presents a scientometric mapping of the main trends, collaboration networks, and thematic foci linked to the use of emerging technologies-such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, big data, the Internet of Things (IoT), and social media mining-in global public health surveillance from 2000 to 2025. The methodology combines bibliometric and social network analysis on documents indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, complemented by a qualitative examination of the fifty most cited studies. The results reveal an exponential growth in scientific output starting from 2010, with an inflection point during the COVID-19 pandemic. The United States, the United Kingdom, and China stand out as the primary centers of production and international collaboration. However, significant gaps persist in digital equity, interoperability, and ethical governance, particularly in regions with lower technological infrastructure. This work contributes to understanding the evolution and challenges of digital epidemiology, proposing a future research agenda centered on algorithmic ethics, transparency, international cooperation, and technological inclusion in vulnerable contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.