ReviewJournal of rheumatic diseases2026
Large vessel vasculitis reframed: integrating conceptual shifts and evidence into practice for Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis.
Review in Journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large vessel vasculitis, encompassing giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, represents a spectrum of granulomatous aortitides with substantially similar clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and therapeutic response. Recent advances have redefined epidemiological trends, expanded the role of multimodal imaging, and clarified the genetic and immunological pathways that shape disease heterogeneity. This review integrates contemporary data on clinical phenotypes, vascular distribution, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies, with attention to unmet clinical needs in Korean practice. Imaging has assumed a central role in diagnosis and monitoring, supported by updated classification criteria and novel activity scores. Although glucocorticoids remain the therapeutic cornerstone, accumulating evidence indicates the use of targeted biologics, and emerging small molecules. However, the optimal sequencing and long-term outcomes remain unelucidated. Persistent gaps include a lack of validated composite outcome measures, limited availability of reliable biomarkers, and uneven implementation of imaging standards. Coordinated multicenter research and improved access to advanced therapies can support the next steps in patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.