Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388235›Full record

ReviewJournal of rheumatic diseases2026

Non-specific cutaneous lupus erythematosus and clinical significance: a literature review.

Nattanicha Chaisrimaneepan, Thunyaporn Khoruamklang, Tulaton Sodsri, Natnicha Jakramonpreeya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nattanicha ChaisrimaneepanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3183-7853
Thunyaporn KhoruamklangChakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2351-7365
Tulaton SodsriChakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-5133
Natnicha JakramonpreeyaChakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0566-573X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is classified into LE-specific cutaneous lesions and LE-non-specific cutaneous lesions. LE-specific lesions, which include acute cutaneous LE, sub-acute cutaneous LE, and chronic cutaneous LE have been well-described and studied regarding their association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and disease activity. Non-specific CLE is divided into thrombogenic (vascular), neutrophilic, or uncertain pathogenesis. Some features such as Raynaud, vasculitis, and alopecia have been well-documented with reported association with other clinical features of SLE and its disease activity. Still, some are under-recognized and not well-studied for their correlation with SLE disease activity, or clinical significance concerning SLE. This review aims to encompass each non-specific CLE and its clinical relevance in SLE. However, the literature was limited in many non-specific LE conditions with the lack of statistical evidence to prove its correlation to SLE or other signs and symptoms of SLE, including morbidity and mortality. Future research can provide predictions of the disease based on non-specific CLE.

Indexed as

Cutaneous lupus erythematosusNon-specific cutaneous lupusSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID42388235
PMCPMC13318811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.