ArticleJHLT open2026
Epidemiology of medical emergency team calls in patients undergoing lung transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx) are at risk of clinical deterioration during hospital ward care. The epidemiology of Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls in LTx patients and their association with patient outcomes are poorly described. Purpose: We aimed to (1) measure the frequency, timing, and characteristics of MET activations in patients undergoing LTx, (2) evaluate differences in demographics and outcomes between those who had a MET call vs those who didn't. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who received MET calls during their index admission for LTx at the Alfred Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021. Results: Amongst 535 patients undergoing LTx, MET activation occurred in 265 (49.5%), with 738 MET activations in total. The MET group had a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) MET calls. Pre-LTx period accounted for 15% of the calls, with hypoxia being the most common trigger (49.5%). During the post-LTx period, tachycardia (28.5%) and hypotension (33.1%) were the most common triggers. Hospital length-of stay (LOS) was longer in the MET group (26 [19-41] vs 19 days [15-27], Conclusions: MET activation is common in patients undergoing LTx. Admissions with MET are associated with higher rates of ICU readmission and longer hospital LOS compared to the no MET group, without affecting survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.