Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388214›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Passive wheels on legged robots: a survey.

James Florin Petri, Gerard Lacey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James Florin PetriDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Gerard LaceyDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, highly dynamic robots have seen a significant rise in both consumer and research applications. Much of the focus on legged robots stems from their ability to adapt to a world built for humans, but energy inefficiency and battery capacity remain significant challenges to widespread adoption. Wheel-legged hybrid locomotion is an increasingly popular solution, as robots combine the energy efficiency and speed of wheels with the versatility and adaptability of legs. Most of the literature focuses on the actuated or active-wheel variant because it is simpler to control. However, recent advances in control strategies and computing power have made the advantages of unactuated or passive wheel-legged robots, such as their mechanical simplicity, low weight, and high energy efficiency, accessible. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the unactuated wheel-legged hybrid robot literature, together with similar systems, to review the alternative implementations and design techniques in the context of the inherent challenges of controlling a legged robot that has passive skates on its feet. We aim to outline the critical factors that determine the system's viability and propose some directions for future research.

Indexed as

low frictionpassive wheelsrobotskatingskiingunactuatedunderactuatedunderdetermined

Identifiers

PMID42388214
PMCPMC13318705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.