ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Landowner Perceptions of Heronry Conservation in Human-Dominated Wetlands of Bangladesh.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heronries-tree-nesting colonies of waterbirds-are globally threatened by wetland loss, yet their conservation remains poorly understood. In Bangladesh, heronries occur in shared wetland-agricultural landscapes, making landowner tolerance a proximate determinant of colony persistence. However, socially informed research on heronry conservation is entirely absent in Bangladesh and rare globally. We conducted focus group discussions at 235 heronry sites across northern Bangladesh, engaging 2555 participants. Drawing on Social-Ecological Systems theory, we examined the human-heronry interface: landowner motivations for tolerance, threats, problems experienced, and preferred conservation interventions. We quantified threat perceptions and identified structural patterns in motivations, problems, and conservation preferences. Habitat loss and poisoning emerged as the most severe threats, with poisoning exceeding 60% weighted severity in all areas. Landowner tolerance was high and primarily driven by ethical concern, environmental benefits, and social recognition. Pattern analysis revealed significant clustering of motivations, problems, and conservation preferences, indicating non-random and interpretable socio-ecological structure. Strong stench from guano fouling was the most widespread problem, while habitat protection, awareness programmes, and signage were the most co-preferred conservation interventions. Financial compensation was supported at 211 of 235 sites, with annual demands averaging USD 348.0 ± 311.6 per site-figures that reflect perceived costs of hosting colonies. Heronry conservation is a structured socio-ecological challenge amenable to targeted, multi-pronged interventions. Our findings demonstrate that least concern species require locally tailored social strategies for persistence in shared landscapes. Three transferable principles emerge for heronry conservation in human-dominated wetlands: (i) landowner tolerance is multifactorial and fragile-currently high but vulnerable to erosion where problems go unaddressed-and must be engaged through simultaneous ethical, environmental, social, and economic pathways; (ii) threat severity is spatially heterogeneous, requiring site-specific adaptive management in the absence of effective enforcement even within formally recognised conservation areas; and (iii) pattern-based diagnostics of community survey data offer a scalable and accessible tool for identifying conservation leverage points in data-limited systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.