ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Hunting Guild Mediates the Effects of Fecundity and Mortality on Sexual Size Dimorphism in Spiders.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) arises from sex-specific selection on body size, primarily through sexual selection, mortality-driven selection on males, and fecundity selection on females. A key ecological factor that may shape both processes is foraging behaviour, which determines movement, predation exposure and resource acquisition. Spiders provide a useful model system to test this idea because they exhibit extensive ecological diversity in prey-capture strategies, and previous work has linked hunting strategies to reproductive traits, body size and SSD. However, these relationships remain poorly resolved and rarely tested within a comparative mechanistic framework. Here, using a phylogenetic comparative analysis of 264 species across eight hunting guilds, we tested whether hunting guild predicts variation in SSD and modulates the relationship between SSD, sex-biased mortality and fecundity. We used sex differences in pitfall trap catches, taken from the literature, as a proxy for sex differences in mobility and mortality. SSD differed markedly among guilds, with the strongest female bias occurring in orb-web weavers. The relationship between SSD and sex-biased mobility/mortality was context-dependent, emerging in sheet weavers but not in ground hunters. In contrast, we consistently predicted female and male body size, but not SSD, with effect sizes varying across guilds. Together, these results suggest that SSD does not arise from universal mechanisms, but from guild-specific sexual asymmetries associated with mobility, predation exposure, and resource access, linking foraging strategy to the macroevolution of body size differences between the sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.