ReviewEcology and evolution2026
Computer Vision for Monitoring Wild Bees and Wasps: A Structured Literature Review.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild bees and wasps are vital to ecosystems, yet large-scale monitoring of individual insects as well as their habitats and behaviors requires expert knowledge and is very labour-intensive. Recent advances in computer vision offer both methodological solutions and practical applications for these tasks. This review systematically surveys state-of-the-art literature (2020-2026) on computer-vision-based monitoring of wild bees and wasps. We compare the primary monitoring tasks, such as individual detection and classification, habitat observation, and assessment of insect behavior, and analyze how specific computer vision techniques contribute to each. By examining the datasets used in the reviewed studies, we further categorize dataset types and collection strategies to inform future image acquisition. In addition, we draw insights from widely used public resources (e.g., iNaturalist, Observation) regarding their strengths and limitations for this domain. We then examine how hardware and software are integrated in these studies, and review released repositories, existing applications, and the design of more complex, multifunctional monitoring stations. These analyses provide guidance for benchmarking and future deployment with existing datasets and monitoring tools. We eventually propose the design of building more comprehensive and efficient automatic monitoring systems for wild bees and wasps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.