ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
From Gene Copies to Cell Numbers: Advancing Quantitative Approaches in Protistan Ecology Using Digital PCR.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying abundances of unicellular eukaryotes (protists) remains a central challenge in microbial ecology, as methodological differences can strongly influence abundance estimates and ecological interpretation. Although molecular tools have thus far greatly improved our understanding of protists, high rRNA gene copy numbers limit quantitative inferences. Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a promising tool for absolute quantification, yet its application for unicellular eukaryotes and its comparability to established cell-based methods remain insufficiently explored. Here, we develop species-specific dPCR assays for two important freshwater ciliates (Urotricha castalia and Urotricha pseudofurcata) and establish gene copy number correction factors to enable highly accurate quantitative abundance estimates. We assess assay performance using controlled laboratory experiments and apply the approach to environmental samples, directly benchmarking dPCR against catalyzed reporter deposition-FISH (CARD-FISH). Under controlled conditions, dPCR and CARD-FISH yielded comparable accuracy, with dPCR showing superior precision. In field applications, method-dependent differences emerged, reflecting both methodological constraints and biological variability. Notably, dPCR provided an overall higher sensitivity, enabling robust detection of low-abundance taxa. Our results highlight dPCR as a scalable and sensitive approach that, when combined with appropriate correction strategies, represents a significant step towards more reliable molecular quantification of protists. At the same time, differences between methods underscore the value of integrating molecular and microscopy-based approaches. We propose that combining dPCR with tools such as CARD-FISH can offer complementary insights into protist population dynamics. Such integrative frameworks provide a powerful path forward for improving abundance estimates and advancing quantitative microbial ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.