Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388095›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology2026

How BI-RADS v2025 Helps Patients: New Audits and Method of Detection.

Peter Reist Eby, Ethan Oren Cohen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter Reist EbyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. peter.eby@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-2073
Ethan Oren CohenDepartment of Breast Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2770-5057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast imaging audits are essential for measuring performance, ensuring regulatory compliance, and improving patient outcomes. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) v2025 Manual refines established auditing principles and introduces several important additions to the Auditing and Outcomes Monitoring chapter. This review details fundamental auditing principles and describes the methodology and rationale for three key updates. First, routine auditing of BI-RADS category 3 assessments is now recommended to promote appropriate use of this category and ensure that it is applied correctly to findings with a ≤2% likelihood of malignancy. Second, a new framework has been introduced for auditing preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging performed for staging, which incorporates both examination-level and finding-level metrics. Third, prospective assignment of the initial method of detection is encouraged to link cancer outcomes directly to screening and clinical presentation. Together, these updates expand breast imaging audits beyond traditional metrics and lay the foundation for future benchmark developments and global standardization.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMedical AuditRadiology Information SystemsFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingBI-RADSBreastCancer, AuditMammographyScreening

Identifiers

PMID42388095
PMCPMC13333230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.