ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Engineering Functional Graphenic Materials for Bone Repair.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Functional Graphenic Materials for Bone Repair.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graphene oxide (GO), a chemically versatile and biocompatible derivative of graphene, has emerged as a highly promising material in the field of bone tissue engineering. This review explores the multifaceted role of GO and other functional graphenic materials (FGMs) in supporting bone regeneration by enhancing osteogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and biomineralization. We begin by detailing the physiological principles of bone healing, current clinical approaches to bone repair, and the limitations they present. The discussion then progresses through the chemical foundations of GO and its derivatives, emphasizing their unique surface chemistry and tunable reactivity that enable precise functionalization for biomedical applications. Finally, we highlight the potential of FGM-based composites, with integrated biological molecules, polymers, and small organic compounds, to serve as bioactive, bioresorbable scaffolds that support bone growth and integration. By bridging material science with regenerative medicine, this review underscores the importance of GO as a versatile platform for next-generation bone regeneration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.