Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42388054›Full record

ReviewGut and liver2026

Biliary Stent Placement by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Quality Indicators and Technical Applications.

Yoon Suk Lee, Tae Joo Jeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut and liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoon Suk LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-9417
Tae Joo JeonPolicy-Quality Management Committee, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8137-1633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a pivotal therapeutic option for the management of various biliary disorders. ERCP is an intrinsically complex procedure associated with risks of adverse events, including pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation; thus, experienced endoscopists must maintain adequate procedural competence. Therefore, endoscopic societies have established quality indicators to ensure procedural safety and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, achieving optimal technical outcomes in biliary stent placement requires a thorough understanding of the appropriate selection and the characteristics of different biliary stents for each clinical situation. Although the most common indication for ERCP is common bile duct stone removal in the setting of acute cholangitis, benign and malignant biliary strictures remain a major focus of clinical research. In this context, this review summarizes the current quality benchmarks proposed by major endoscopic societies and provides an overview of mechanical properties of plastic stents and self-expandable metal stents and their technical considerations in pancreatobiliary disorders that are frequently encountered in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract DiseasesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeQuality Indicators, Health CareStentsCholestasisHumansBile ductsBiliary tract procedureEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyQuality indicatorsStents

Identifiers

PMID42388054
PMCPMC13364731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.