ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026
Hidden caveats in tick dissection: engorgement level and complex tracheal network architecture compromise internal organ integrity.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tick dissection is fundamental for isolating internal organs for histological, developmental, cell culture, microbiome, functional, and epidemiological studies. However, comparative anatomical details and methodological guidance for identification, and aseptic isolation of internal organs remain limited. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the internal anatomy of hard ticks using Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, H. flava Neumann, and Amblyomma testudinarium Koch as the dissection materials and identify optimal dissection approaches for obtaining intact and contamination-free organs. Six groups of ticks, categorized by species, sex, life stage, and engorgement level, were dissected in aseptic conditions under a stereomicroscope. Internal morphoanatomical features were compared across groups, with particular emphasis on salivary glands, Malpighian tubules, gonads, tracheae, and associated organs. Given the risk of cross-organ contamination, the ease of tick handling, organ-specific separation techniques, difficulties, and immediate troubleshooting are documented. Dissection feasibility was found to vary by sexes, developmental stages, and engorgement states. A dense tracheal network was consistently observed across all groups, regardless of maturity. Organ isolation was most efficient in adult males owing to their simpler internal anatomy, reduced midgut blood volume, and less extensive tracheae. Engorgement level and tracheal complexity remained key limiting factors influencing the efficiency of dissection and ability to retrieve desired organs without cross-organ contamination, particularly due to fragmented tissues and midgut contents. Partly engorged, mid-sized adult ticks provide optimal conditions to master dissection techniques. This integrated approach has transformed the descriptive tick dissection into pictorial methodological guidance and offers comparative anatomical insights for tick dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.