ReviewJournal of rehabilitation medicine2026
Identification of spastic muscles involved in abnormal joint posture in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have specifically investigated which muscles are involved in abnormal joint posture (AJP) due to muscle spasticity and should therefore be targeted for botulinum toxin injections. This gap has significant implications for treatment efficiency, safety, health economics, and sustainable healthcare. A 2000 to 2025 (July) PubMed search identified 3,488 articles, but only 7 articles met the criteria for providing a method to determine the muscles involved in AJP due to muscle spasticity. Of these, just 2 have proposed how to measure each muscle contribution and only 1 focused on identifying the muscle actually responsible for the observed AJP. There are many strategies for determining the muscles involved in spasticity-related AJP, but they are primarily based on inference. They draw on clinical skills, which incorporate descriptive and functional anatomy, knowledge of different muscle and joint structures, simple rules of biomechanics, determination of the exact phase of the movement involved, consideration of compensatory AJP in these motor control deficient patterns, and, of course, the patient's goals. Achieving the authors' proposed objective would enable the standardization of clinical practices, confirm the effectiveness of treatments for spasticity, particularly botulinum toxin, and ensure that the correct dose is injected in the right muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.