ArticleThoracic research and practice2026
Not All Corridors are Equal: Corridor Length Affects 6-minute Walk Test Performance-A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe recommended corridor length for the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is 30 meters. However, it is not always feasible in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to compare walking distance and hemodynamic responses during 6MWTs performed in 10-, 20-, and 30-meter corridors in healthy young adults. MATERIAL AND
methodsThirty-four healthy young adults (mean age: 21.2±1.5 years; female/male: 25/9) completed three randomized 6MWTs in 10-, 20-, and 30-meter corridors on separate days and with a crossover design. Walking distance, mean walking speed, and step counts were measured. Heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, dyspnea, and fatigue were recorded at baseline (Pre), immediately post-test (Post), and at 3 (R3) and 5 (R5) minutes of recovery. Data were analyzed using the Friedman test with post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Bonferroni correction.
resultsWalking distance and speed were significantly lower in the 10-meter corridor than in the 20- and 30-meter corridors (
conclusionAlthough hemodynamic responses were comparable across different corridor lengths, the 10-meter corridor led to an underestimation of walking distance by ~60 meters and to increased subjective fatigue and dyspnea. A 20-meter corridor may serve as a feasible alternative when the standard 30-meter corridor is unavailable in clinical practice, whereas a 10-meter corridor should be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.