ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Migrating Needle in Right Ventricle Wall With Purulent Tamponade.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migration of foreign bodies to the right ventricle is a very rare condition, but may lead to a life-threatening state in the patient. Moreover, the presentation of symptoms in such cases may be deceiving. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 41-year-old man with a long-standing history of intravenous drug abuse who was admitted with chest and epigastric pain accompanied by hematemesis. Computed tomography demonstrated a pericardial effusion and a thin metallic foreign body embedded in the right ventricular wall. Further history revealed needle breakage during intravenous injection 2 weeks prior to admission. Transthoracic echocardiography showed signs of cardiac tamponade. Due to elevated inflammatory markers, empiric antibiotic therapy was initiated, and the patient was referred for urgent cardiothoracic surgery. Surgical exploration revealed purulent pericardial tamponade and a 20-mm needle fragment embedded in the right ventricular wall, which was successfully removed. Microbiological cultures confirmed methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and inflammatory markers initially normalized under targeted antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS The presented case illustrates a rare and unexpected complication of intravenous drug abuse. It highlights a rare dual-mechanism pathophysiology: purulent pericardial effusion occurring in the presence of an intramyocardial needle. To date, only a few similar cases have been reported in the literature. No specific symptoms allow for early diagnosis, and completing a proper anamnesis seems to be the most valuable action in such situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.