ArticleSkeletal muscle2026
Regenerative Index: a method to assess muscle regeneration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Article in Skeletal muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating disease manifested in skeletal muscle by repetitious myonecrosis and regeneration. Because the regenerative process is closely linked to the cumulative severity of muscle damage, which is variably distributed within and between muscle groups, accurately quantifying muscle regeneration has remained a significant challenge.
methodsMyofibers are delineated by immunostaining for laminin, and subsequent image analysis employed to generate a masked outline precisely within each myofiber boundary. Morphometric parameters including minimal Feret's diameter, cross-sectional area, and circularity were measured for each myofiber. In addition, the number of Pax7-expressing satellite cells were quantified. To evaluate regenerative activity, newly formed myofibers were identified by immunostaining for expression of embryonic myosin heavy chain (eMHC). Necrotic myofibers were enumerated by immunofluorescent detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) infiltration. The Regenerative Index (RI) was calculated as the number of regenerating (eMHC
resultsA trend toward an increasing minimal Feret's diameter, cross-sectional area and circularity was observed with increasing age in DMD boys, with circularity showing the strongest trend. Furthermore, compared to DMD boys 7- to 8-years old, the boys 9- to 11-years old had increased myofiber circularity. Pax7-expressing cells per myofiber were elevated in DMD boys compared to control boys of similar ages, without any observation of age-related changes. The Regenerative Index in DMD boys exhibited a decline between 7 and 11 years of age, with an inverse correlation between RI and age.
conclusionsThe use of eMHC and IgG immunostaining to calculate RI appears to provide a way to assess regeneration across biopsies that differ in histopathologic severity. Using this approach, RI showed a negative correlation with age in DMD boys aged 7 to 11 years which requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.