ArticleBMC psychology2026
The transfer effects of executive function training on prospective memory in children with learning difficulties: a longitudinal study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtensive empirical evidence has established that children with learning difficulties (LDs) experience pronounced deficits in prospective memory (PM) - the cognitive ability to encode, maintain, and successfully execute delayed intentions. However, the specific mechanisms underlying these PM impairments remain underexplored, while extant intervention studies demonstrate marked heterogeneity in treatment outcomes. The present study sought to bridge these critical gaps by expanding the empirical foundation regarding PM dysfunction in children with LDs and exploring the improvement patterns of core executive function (EF) subcomponents (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) during PM development within this population.
methodsWe assessed LDs' PM performance using a computerized dual-task paradigm and developed a comprehensive EF training protocol targeting these three subcomponents, which was delivered across twelve progressive sessions. Ninety-three children aged from 10 to 12 were randomly allocated to cognitive training (CT) group, behavioral training (BT) group, or control group, with PM performance assessed at pre-, post-training, and six-month follow-up.
resultsThe results revealed prominent PM enhancements for two training groups, with CT group demonstrating superior effect compared to BT group both at post-training and six-month follow-up assessments. Furthermore, distinct temporal improvement patterns were identified across EF domains: working memory showed rapid gains at early training stage, while inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility exhibited progressive growth in middle to late stages.
conclusionsThese findings make meaningful contributions to the field by offering preliminary indications for improving PM performance through EF training in children with LDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.