ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Droplet digital PCR-based pathogen monitoring system improves identifying Haemaphysalis longicornis infected with Bandavirus dabieense and other tick-borne pathogens at low concentrations.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsian long-horned ticks, Haemaphysalis longicornis, vector viruses, bacteria and parasites that cause major zoonotic diseases in human. In order to prevent and manage the spread of tick-borne zoonosis, it is important to monitor pathogen prevalence in wild tick populations using molecular diagnostics with high detection performance. In this study, we introduce a novel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based pathogen monitoring system to identify Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks infected with Bandavirus dabieense and other zoonotic pathogens at low concentrations with higher sensitivity and accuracy from existing molecular detection methods.
methodsUsing metrologically certified B. dabieense RNA reference materials, we directly compared the detection limits between ddPCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Then, among 502 individual H. longicornis adult ticks collected from fields, we determined the detection rate of ticks infected with B. dabieense. We also investigated tick innate immune system, JAK/STAT, for its relevance in identifying ticks infected with low concentrations of B. dabieense. From B. dabieense-infected ticks, we examined for other tick-borne pathogens and nucleic acid concentrations of identified pathogens using ddPCR.
resultsOur ddPCR-based method showed high sensitivity by 20 times lower detection limits than that of qPCR. Detection rate of ticks infected with B. dabieense from fields was 35.9%. Among ticks infected with low B. dabieense virus concentrations, defined by the B. dabieense RNA copy numbers in bottom 25% quartiles observed from infected ticks, STAT expression level was significantly higher compared to laboratory strains and uninfected field populations. Lastly, multiplexed ddPCR results indicated that individual ticks can harbor up to four different pathogens concurrently.
conclusionsOur newly developed ddPCR-based pathogen monitoring system improves the identification of H. longicornis infected with B. dabieense and other tick-borne pathogens at low nucleic acid concentrations compared with qPCR. In addition, our results suggest that STAT expression may provide exploratory and complementary insight into tick innate immune activation in low-copy B. dabieense infections, and that ddPCR-based multiplexing can detect co-infections with multiple tick-borne pathogens in individual ticks. These findings highlight the potential of ddPCR as a sensitive and practical tool for surveillance and management of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens in vector populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.