SynthesisBMC psychology2026
Emotion regulation in children and adolescents: a systematic review and quality assessment of behavioral and physiological assessment methods and their theoretical foundations.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmotion regulation (ER) is crucial for understanding mental health and disorders. Valid and reliable ER measures are needed to develop models for mental health promotion and treatment. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of ER behavioral observation and physiological measures of children and adolescents, including their theoretical embedding and psychometric properties.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, Psyndex plus, and Web of Science without language restrictions. We included empirical studies assessing ER as an outcome variable in children and adolescents aged 0-15 years using at least one behavioral or physiological ER measure. Studies on secondary literature were excluded. Measurement types, theoretical grounding, and psychometric properties (reliability, validity, objectivity) were extracted and compared across age groups using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.
resultsA total of 516 studies met inclusion criteria. Only 5% reported validity evidence, 62% reliability, and 20% objectivity. Few studies referenced an ER definition or empirically tested an ER model. LAB-TAB and Delay of Gratification tasks were the most common behavioral observation measures, whereas RSA and EEG dominated physiological measures. Behavioral observation was more frequently used in younger children, whereas physiological measures were more common in older children (p < .001; V = .37). Most studies focused on the regulation of negative emotions (91%), and 90% relied on a single ER measure.
conclusionER measurement in children and adolescents is characterized by limited psychometric reporting and insufficient theoretical integration. This review provides an overview of available methods and their psychometric properties, facilitating the selection of appropriate measures for future research. Greater emphasis on validity, multimethod approaches, theoretical grounding, and the inclusion of positive emotions is needed to improve measurement standards and advance ER research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.