ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Disrupting power hierarchies: applying a trauma- informed, intersectional, reflexive engagement strategy.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with lived experience in health care, like patients and their family and/or friend caregivers, are important to include in the research process to improve impact and relevance of research. However, these lived experience researchers (LERs) can be harmed if this engagement is done poorly, especially though tokenization, or through the reliving of health care related traumatic experience. Five LERs joined a research team that collaboratively developed a research proposal through seven workshops. The research topic was of care transitions from hospital to home, of which all five LERs had lived experience as patients or caregivers. To mitigate harm for the LERs, the project was designed with a trauma-informed, intersectional and reflexive approach, with a focus on disrupting historical power structures inherent in research and health care systems. The engagement design was planned a priori and uniquely incorporated regular feedback mechanisms and strategies to support reflexivity for all team members. This engagement strategy had some success in disrupting standard power hierarchies that persist in research teams and can impede meaningful LER engagement. Ultimately the LERs felt heard and understood by the team and developed strong relationships with the principal investigator (PI) and project coordinator, and they contrasted this experience with other health and research experiences where they perceived their input to have less weight. The reflexive approach revealed what aspects of the engagement were going well, and which continued to be plagued by historical power and hierarchies inherent in academic and health systems. While the continual feedback process did not allow the team to completely overcome these hierarchies, it brought them to light so that they could be addressed as much as possible within the context of the project, and we share three examples in this commentary. We hope that this detailed description of developing a research proposal using a power-focused framework with a team with multiple LERs helps to address the gap in the literature about how researchers can support the reduction of power hierarchies when engaging LERs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.