ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2026
Personalized chemotherapy guidance using patient-derived scaffolds from peritoneal colorectal metastases.
Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer are associated with poor survival and limited therapeutic efficacy. To model patient-specific treatment responses, we generated patient-derived scaffolds (PDS) through tumor decellularization, preserving critical microenvironmental features for functional ex vivo analysis. PDS from 75 metastases were recellularized with HT29 cells and treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C, or oxaliplatin. Gene expression related to proliferation, epithelial phenotype, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and stemness was quantified and integrated into a composite treatment score to estimate the most favorable therapy for each patient. Treatment responses were influenced by both drug exposure and the patient-specific microenvironment. Importantly, subcluster distributions differed across treatment arms, supporting the concept that therapeutic response is modulated by microenvironmental context rather than being solely drug dependent. These findings were supported in a smaller validation cohort using HCT116 and DLD-1 cells recellularized into selected PDS. Treatment scoring based on HT29 cells revealed heterogeneous sensitivity patterns, with 38.7% of PDS responding best to 5-FU, 36% to mitomycin C, and 25.3% to oxaliplatin. Patients with more than two favorable treatment scores had improved disease-free survival (p = 0.0415). The PDS platform enables functional profiling of chemotherapy-response and may support individualized treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.