Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42387529›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2026

Pro-EGCG suppresses endometriosis progression via regulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Qianhan Xu, Lu Chen, Jun Chen, Haoyue Hu, Zhihua Luo, Zhentao Gong, Yee Lee Ng, Jinchuan Liu, Sze Wan Hung, Yi Song and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Qianhan XuAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Lu ChenAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Haoyue HuReproductive Medicine Center, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhihua LuoDepartment of Gynaecology, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhentao GongAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yee Lee NgAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jinchuan LiuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Center of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Sze Wan HungAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yi SongAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Nga Ping IpAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
See Yung ChauAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yonggang DuanShenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Center of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Chi Chiu WangAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ting GuoState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Shandong, China.
Kam Tong LeungDepartment of Pediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jingying ZhouSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pui Wah ChungAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. jacquelinechung@cuhk.edu.hk.
Tao ZhangAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. taozhang@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

CUHK Direct Grant 2021032National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPro-EGCG has shown therapeutic promise for endometriosis, yet its immunoregulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are key drivers of disease progression. This study investigates whether Pro-EGCG alleviates endometriosis by modulating MDSC-mediated immune and stromal dysregulation.

methodsThe therapeutic effects of Pro-EGCG were evaluated in an experimental endometriosis mouse model by assessing lesion burden, histology, and MDSC dynamics. The functional necessity of monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) was validated via adoptive transfer. Clinical relevance was assessed in peripheral blood and lesions from women with or without endometriosis via flow cytometry and multiplex immunofluorescence staining. Furthermore, the direct effects of Pro-EGCG on human PBMC-derived M-MDSCs were examined in vitro, including their immunosuppressive function and their ability to promote fibrosis in a co-culture system with human endometriotic stromal cells.

resultsIn the mouse model, Pro-EGCG treatment significantly reduced lesion weight, volume, and fibrosis, accompanied by consistent M-MDSC reduction systemically and locally. Lesion-infiltrating M-MDSCs, rather than polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs), positively correlated with disease severity. Adoptive transfer of M-MDSCs reversed Pro-EGCG's therapeutic effects. In clinical samples, data confirmed a significant expansion of M-MDSCs in patients with endometriosis compared to controls. In vitro, Pro-EGCG compromised human M-MDSC survival and impaired their suppressive capacity by inhibiting ROS, Arg-1, and NO production. Furthermore, M-MDSC-induced stromal cell proliferation and fibrotic gene expression were abolished by Pro-EGCG preconditioning.

conclusionPro-EGCG hinders endometriosis progression by inhibiting M-MDSC accumulation, immunosuppressive functions, and pro-endometriotic activities. These findings position Pro-EGCG as a potential immunotherapy for endometriosis and other M-MDSC-driven inflammatory disorders.

Indexed as

EndometriosisFibrosisImmunosuppressionMonocytic MDSCsMyeloid-derived suppressor cellsPro-EGCG

Identifiers

PMID42387529
PMCPMC13321424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.