ArticleBMC health services research2026
Fidelity in the context of adapting a digital intervention for depression from an evidence-based in-person format in Vietnam.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital interventions have emerged as a promising way to better meet growing population mental health needs. Our team developed a digital depression intervention (VMood; smartphone app) in Vietnam. VMood is adapted from an evidence-based in-person intervention (SSM) developed in Canada and uses cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) principles with remote coaching by non-specialist providers. Fidelity-adaptation is a major tension in implementation science. Fidelity is the degree an intervention is designed and delivered as intended. Conversely, adaptations are sometimes made for specific contexts. This paper aims to identify key elements of fidelity-adaptation - the degree VMood is consistent theoretically with the SSM intervention and practically with implementing digitally in the Vietnamese setting.
methodsThis study uses Perez et al.'s modified version of Carroll et al.'s Implementation Fidelity Framework, focusing on Objective 1: Conceptualizing what intervention fidelity means in this specific context (across modes and cultures) and Objective 2: Conducting fidelity testing to identify key elements along the fidelity-adaptation continuum. Ethnographic data from team meetings explored essential components that must remain intact and necessary adaptations. Non-specialist providers and app users from Vietnam tested VMood. Experts familiar with CBT provided theoretical feedback. Interviews or focus groups were conducted with all participants to gain insights into the adaptive intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
resultsParticipants agreed that VMood captures the essential theoretical components from SSM, noting certain elements of SSM (e.g., change in human contact to online) could not be replicated digitally. Participants also presented adaptation suggestions unique for the digital format to strengthen VMood's acceptability, including keeping the app simple by reducing the amount of text; incorporating more dynamic content (e.g., animations) to increase engagement; and including more culturally appropriate scenarios. Finally, key potential moderators to fidelity reported included quality of program delivery and participant responsiveness.
conclusionsFindings identified intervention specific elements of fidelity-adaptation and showed that VMood retained essential components of SSM while incorporating adaptations to support implementation within the Vietnamese context. With the global increase in digital health services adapted from in-person delivery, understanding how to balance fidelity with necessary adaptations is important both theoretically and practically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.