Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42387514›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2026

The digital legacy in end-of-life care: unspectacular and meaningless, or not enough recognized? An online survey on the attitudes and personal experiences of professionals and volunteers.

Anne Meißner, Dafina Mahaj

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne MeißnerInstitute of Business Administration and Business Informatics, Head of IT for the Caring Society Research Group, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany. anne.meissner@uni-hildesheim.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6723-4045
Dafina MahajInstitute of Social and Organizational Pedagogy, IT for the Caring Society Research Group, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

titleThe digital legacy in end-of-life care: Unspectacular and meaningless, or not enough recognized? An online survey on the attitudes and personal experiences of professionals and volunteers.

backgroundThe digital era has transformed the way individuals construct and perpetuate their identities, leaving an indelible mark not only in the analogue but also in the digital realm. The digital legacy, comprising online artefacts and virtual traces, plays a pivotal role in shaping one's personality and life narrative. Recognizing its impact on the bereaved and the dying and understanding the nuances of digital legacy are crucial for providing meaningful end-of-life care. Despite the increasing importance of this phenomenon, there is a substantial research gap, and a comprehensive discussion regarding the relevance of digital legacy for dignified and value-oriented end-of-life support is lacking in Germany.

methodsBased on the recommendations of the German Federal Ministry of Justice regarding the handling of digital legacy, a 34-item questionnaire was developed. A nationwide online survey was conducted using a random sample. Participants were recruited through palliative and hospice organizations with the aim of capturing attitudes, perceived needs, competency requirements, personal experiences and assessments of various professional and occupational groups, including nursing, medicine, social work, and volunteering. The collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and four free-text options integrated into the survey were evaluated through content analysis.

resultsA total of 396 people participated in the survey, mainly professionals (42.3%) and volunteers (30.8%). For approximately one-quarter of the respondents (26.9%), clear identification was not possible, and they made use of the option 'other'. The majority of respondents were female (82.3%), over 50 years old (74.5%) and had > 5 years of professional or work experience (75.7%), predominantly in outpatient care (66.0%). The study showed that the majority of respondents considered the relevance of the digital legacy as high. Moreover, according to 85.8% of the respondents, it does not receive enough attention in end-of-life care. The way in which digital legacies are dealt with varied considerably and were ambivalent in some cases. There is uncertainty with regard to professional responsibilities and the need for guidance, although most respondents perceived their own skills as inadequate and sought to broaden or deepen their knowledge (90.1%). Additionally, there was little engagement with one's own digital legacy. The free-text responses illustrated a lack of awareness, uncertainty and the desire for further training and supporting materials.

conclusionsThe discrepancy between the recognized importance and the lack of direct engagement with one's own digital legacy, as well as the uncertainties in supporting people at the end of their lives, becomes clear and underscores the need for specific programmes that close existing knowledge gaps and promote awareness of how to handle the digital legacy in a valuable and dignified manner in the context of end-of-life care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelTerminal CareVolunteersAdultAgedDigital HealthFemaleGermanyHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudes and ExperiencesDigital LegacyDigital SkillsEnd-of-Life CareProfessional and Volunteer Perspectives

Identifiers

PMID42387514
PMCPMC13326446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.