Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Comparing the health implications of heat exposure in pregnant women in rural and urban Tamil Nadu: An exploratory cohort study.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreased temperatures caused by climate change may have an adverse impact on pregnant women's health outcomes. Understanding the disparities in heat vulnerabilities between rural and urban pregnant women (RPW and UPW) could help prioritize and develop tailored interventions to protect the most vulnerable.
methodsWe conducted an observational cohort study from 2018 to 2021 among 680 pregnant women in Tamil Nadu from six districts. We measured the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) exposure and Heat Strain Indicators (HSI) such as urine specific gravity and core body temperature using standardised protocols. We used a validated questionnaire to elucidate the self-reported heat strain symptoms (SHSS), adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), and adverse birth outcomes (ABOs).
resultsA higher percentage of RPWs had WBGT exposure (55%) above the permissible limit with an average WBGT of 26.8 °C ± 1.0 °C compared to the UPW (45%) with an average exposure of 26.9 °C ± 0.8 °C. RPWs were more likely than UPWs to report SHSS (84% vs. 71%) and HSIs (31% vs. 22%) among 680 women. After controlling for the potential confounders, heat exposed RPWs (N = 372) had nearly double the risk of APOs (95% CI 1.2-5.2) and thrice the risk of ABOs (95% CI 1.3-7.4). Furthermore, based upon the heat exposure during the first trimester the heat exposed RPWs (N = 248) had a 4-fold higher risk of miscarriages than the UPWs (95% CI 1.1-16.5). The lack of awareness and mitigation strategies against heat risk, low socioeconomic status, and reduced access to welfare facilities can contribute to RPW's high heat risk vulnerability.
conclusionThe study underscores the necessity to protect RPW from heat and APOs. In-depth cohort studies are required to identify risk factors and develop protective strategies for these women.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.