Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42387494›Full record

ArticlePopulation health metrics2026

New insights into inequalities in life expectancy and mortality: evidence from an Individual-level Socio-Economic Index (ISEI) in Australia.

Tim Adair, Han Li, Sergey Timonin, Andrew Cairns, Vladimir Canudas-Romo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health metrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tim AdairNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Level 2, 32 Lincoln Square North, Carlton, 3010, VIC, Australia. timothy.adair@unimelb.edu.au.
Han LiCentre for Actuarial Studies, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sergey TimoninNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Andrew CairnsDuncan Laboratory for Insurance Data Science, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Vladimir Canudas-RomoSchool of Demography, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP210100401Australian Research Council FT240100506Medical Research Future Fund Million Minds 1179461, Cardiovascular Mission 2034149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocio-economic inequalities in life expectancy and mortality have received significant academic and policy attention in many high-income countries. Most studies to date have measured area-level inequalities either using a composite socio-economic index or individual-level inequalities using a single or limited variables (e.g. education, income). However, these approaches might underestimate life expectancy inequalities compared to a composite index of individual-level socioeconomic characteristics.

methodsThis study fills a major gap in evidence of life expectancy inequalities by analysing 2016 Population Census data linked at the individual level to death registration data from 2016 to 19 in Australia. We used Multiple Correspondence Analysis to construct an Individual-level Socio-Economic Index (ISEI) comprising variables representing education, income, marital status and whether living alone, housing tenure, migrant status, place of residence and neighbourhood socio-economic index. The ISEI was constructed separately for each sex and 10-year age group. Life expectancy at 25 and 65 years, partial life expectancy from 25 to 65 years and age-standardised and age-specific mortality rates were calculated and compared between ISEI percentiles (approximately 85,000 population each) and percentile groups.

resultsLife expectancy at age 25 years ranged from 43.2 (95% confidence intervals 42.8-43.6) years in the lowest (p1) ISEI percentile to 62.9 (62.5-63.4) years in the highest (p100) for males (gap of 19.7 years) and 51.7 (51.3-52.2) to 64.3 (64.0-64.8) years for females (gap of 12.6 years). The ISEI-life expectancy relationship was strong across all percentiles, with the gradient steepest in the lowest percentiles, flatter in middle deciles and slightly steeper in the highest percentiles. Partial life expectancy from 25 to 65 years had a steep gradient in the lowest ISEI percentiles but had a narrower total gap compared with life expectancy at 65 years. Age-standardised mortality rates (25-64 years) differed between p1 and p100 by a magnitude of 17.7 times for males and 11.8 times for females, with the largest disparities at 35-54 years.

conclusionsThis study shows substantial and concerning inequalities in life expectancy and mortality in Australia. By analysing these indicators with greater granularity than earlier studies by using a multidimensional socio-economic index, it shows wider disparities than previously and the important contribution of a wide range of social determinants.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesLife ExpectancyMortalityAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsAustraliaInequalitiesLife expectancyMortalitySocial determinants of healthSocio-economic index.

Identifiers

PMID42387494
PMCPMC13330459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.