ArticleBMC surgery2026
To explore or not: machine learning models for intraoperative decision on testicular exploration in infants under 3 months with incarcerated inguinal hernia.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a machine learning (ML) model for preoperative prediction of testicular necrosis risk in male infants under 3 months with incarcerated inguinal hernia (IIH), addressing the limitations of current assessment methods.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 288 male infants under 3 months with IIH who underwent emergency surgery. Key preoperative variables (testicular blood flow, echotexture, incarceration duration, procalcitonin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were used to train ten ML models. Performance was evaluated using ROC AUC, PR AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. SHAP analysis assessed interpretability.
resultsThe Gradient Boosting model performed best, achieving a ROC AUC of 0.940 and a recall of 0.889. SHAP identified absent testicular blood flow, heterogeneous echotexture, prolonged incarceration, and elevated procalcitonin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as top predictors.
conclusionThis ML model predicts testicular necrosis risk preoperatively. By integrating color Doppler ultrasound, serological markers, and clinical data, it offers an interpretable tool to guide selective testicular exploration, potentially optimizing outcomes. However, given the single-center retrospective nature of this study, external validation in multi-center prospective cohorts is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.