ArticleBMC cancer2026
Complications and survival after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophagectomy (OE) remains a complex procedure with a considerable risk of severe postoperative complications. There is conflicting evidence if major postoperative complications impair long-term oncological survival. This retrospective study was designed to retest the hypothesis that complications after OE impact on long-term survival in a large and highly standardized cohort of esophageal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND
methods733 patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (IL-OE) for cancer from 2016 to 2021 at our tertiary center were analysed from a prospectively maintained database. Postoperative complications were correlated to overall survival.
resultsNeither occurrence of major complications ≥ Clavien-Dindo (CD) IIIB (Median OS not reached in both groups, p = 0.45, HR 1.12) nor AL (Median OS not reached for no AL vs. 50 months for AL, p = 0.49, HR 0.96) nor pulmonary complications (Median OS not reached in both groups, p = 0.61, HR 0.76) had an impact on overall survival. However, the necessity for postoperative readmission to ICU (reaICU) had a significant impact on overall survival (Median OS not reached for no reaICU vs. 40 months for reaICU, p = 0.037, HR 1.54). Mean follow up was 27 months.
conclusionAmong all variables, only ICU readmission significantly affected overall survival. Postoperative complications and in particular anastomotic leakage after IL-OE, per se, may have a less significant impact on overall survival than previously anticipated. This might be due to a highly sufficient management of complications that progressively avoids requirement of severe septic complications and intensive care treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.