ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder among first responders: implications for public health response and system resilience.
Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFirst responders, including Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel, police officers, firefighters, and disaster responders, are at increased risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to repeated exposure to traumatic events. Although EMS personnel face unique occupational stressors, much of the available evidence on PTSD interventions is derived from broader first-responder populations. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness, feasibility, and sustainability of psychological interventions for PTSD among first responders, with particular attention to their relevance for EMS personnel.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were included. Eligible studies involved first responders, including EMS personnel, police officers, firefighters, disaster workers, and emergency service personnel. Psychological interventions analyzed included trauma-focused therapies (e.g., eye movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] and cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT]), group-based approaches (e.g., critical incident stress debriefing [CISD]), and resilience- or mindfulness-based programs. Primary outcomes were PTSD symptoms measured using validated instruments, while secondary outcomes included psychological distress, resilience, and related mental health indicators.
resultsFifteen studies with varying sample sizes were included. Trauma-focused interventions, particularly EMDR and CBT, demonstrated the most consistent effectiveness in reducing PTSD symptoms across first-responder populations. Group-based interventions showed mixed findings, with some studies reporting short-term benefits and others demonstrating limited or no effect on PTSD outcomes. Resilience- and mindfulness-based programs were generally associated with improvements in short-term psychological well-being but showed limited evidence of sustained long-term benefits. Seven studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias, while the remaining studies presented methodological limitations of varying severity.
conclusionsEMDR and CBT appear to be the most promising interventions for reducing PTSD symptoms among first responders. However, the evidence specific to EMS personnel remains limited, as many available studies involve broader first-responder populations. Further high-quality, EMS-specific research with standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up is needed to strengthen the evidence base and inform occupational mental health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.