ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
A novel laypeople mass-casualty assessment algorithm: LACA.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaypeople, usually the first on scene at a mass casualty event, still have no input into early operational tactics. A new and easy to learn algorithm done by laypeople might gain additional information for operational tactics, especially reinforcement.
methodsA validated mass casualty data set was used to generate sets of 20 patients. The triage gold standard was compared to severity scores of different already established algorithms as well as the new invented allocation algorithm LACA. For algorithm quality Cronbach's Kappa, specificity, sensitivity, over- and underassessment was examined. Kullback-Leibler-Divergence was used to show information loss.
resultsThe LACA algorithm showed a moderate severity correlation (Cohen's Kappa = 0.469), lower than mSTaRT or PRIOR. PRIOR showed the already well known and intentional overassessment. LACA showed highest underassessment of all three evaluated algorithms. After adjustment the information loss could be reduced to D
conclusionsThe "LACA" represents a practical and layperson-friendly addition to pre-hospital response strategies in mass casualty incidents. It can provide a reliable initial assessment that supports early operational decision-making. Additionally, this new approach enables emergency dispatch centers to perform a more tailored mobilization of rescue resources in the first place, based on the structured information provided by laypeople or lay responders. To maximize individual survival LACA must be followed by established triage algorithms like mSTaRT or PRIOR applied by trained emergency personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.