ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026
Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults Living With Higher Weight: An Updated Systematic Review of Questionnaire Diagnostic Accuracy.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEating disorders are more prevalent in people with higher weight than those with low weight. However, contention between the fields of obesity and eating disorders has prevented meaningful progress in research, prevention, identification and coordinated clinical services for people with co-occurring conditions. In Australia, public health approaches and provision of treatment services for people with eating disorders and clinical obesity are siloed, often resulting in contradictory messaging. To address this, a roundtable meeting was held in November 2024 in Sydney, Australia, with 28 experts in one or both of these fields, including researchers, clinicians and service leaders working across paediatric and adult care, and individuals with lived experience. Guided by the National Eating Disorders Collaboration stepped system of care framework, participants identified key challenges and possible solutions, and established five priority actions. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: The priority actions across sectors are: Health Campaigns focused on raising awareness of eating disorders at higher weight, using appropriate language and reducing weight stigma; improved Screening and Assessment using standardised protocols across healthcare settings; supporting Primary Healthcare and improving the use of Medicare items; Tailored Treatment Pathways including integrated care models; and building Workforce Capacity to upskill professionals to provide safe, person-centred care. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THE STATEMENT: These actions aim to promote improved cross-sector collaboration and effective, safe, coordinated and integrated approaches to prevention, identification and treatment across the fields of obesity and eating disorders. They address the complex medical and psychological needs of those with co-occurring eating disorders and higher weight or clinical obesity through a skilled workforce and improved access to care. Effective integration, collaboration and coordination across services is essential for long-term recovery support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.