Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42387251›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

The signaling mechanism of phyA involves direct interaction with ATG8 to regulate HY5 autophagic degradation under nutrient starvation.

Lu Jiang, Shilong Zhang, Huishan Liu, Ran Zhao, Yuting Niu, Tao Lu, Yuqian Zhang, Chenxi Zhang, Yuting Zhao, XinYi Li and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Lu Jiang *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-1958
Shilong Zhang *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-6481
Huishan Liu *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6205-2447
Ran ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1637-6331
Yuting NiuShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2912-0019
Tao LuShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6652-7358
Yuqian ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7584-2869
Chenxi ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4470-8822
Yuting ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7467-1007
XinYi LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5710-7441
Lu WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1032-5885
Guangqiong YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-2214
Jiachen ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1859-4842
MengXue LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9893-0294
Zhilei MaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-8048
Tongtong GuoShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-3929
Hong-Quan YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-2665
Wenxiu WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-9553

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFA1306702National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytochrome A (phyA), the only far-red light (FRL) photoreceptor, initiates photomorphogenesis under FRL. Autophagy, an evolutionarily conserved degradation pathway, facilitates plant adaptation to nutrient stress. Recent studies revealed that elongated hypocotyl 5 (HY5) undergoes autophagic degradation during carbon and nitrogen starvation, a process antagonized by cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) through its binding to autophagy-related 8 (ATG8). The present study investigated how phyA engages with autophagy to mediate FRL signaling under nutrient starvation in Arabidopsis, a process whose mechanisms remain unclear. We combined protein-protein interaction, genetic, phenotypic, autophagic degradation, transcriptomic, and cellular localization assays to investigate this process. We demonstrate that autophagy-deficient mutants atg5, atg7, and atg8n exhibit enhanced photomorphogenesis under FRL. We further show that phyA physically interacts with ATG8 to suppress HY5 degradation via the autophagy pathway during combined FRL and nutrient starvation. Moreover, phyA restrains the nuclear export of ATG8e and inhibits autophagosome formation. Collectively, our results identify a phyA-ATG8-HY5 regulatory module that orchestrates photomorphogenesis under nutrient deficiency. These findings, together with earlier reports on CRY1, illustrate how distinct photoreceptors employ divergent strategies to converge on autophagy and fine-tune HY5 stability, thereby optimizing plant growth in fluctuating light and nutrient environments.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsNitrogenPhytochrome AAutophagosomesAutophagyAutophagy-Related Protein 8 FamilyGene Expression Regulation, PlantSignal TransductionArabidopsis ProteinsATG8 protein, ArabidopsisAutophagy-Related Protein 8 FamilyBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsHY5 protein, ArabidopsisNitrogenPhytochrome AArabidopsisATG8autophagyfar‐red lightHY5nutrient starvationphotomorphogenesisphyA

Identifiers

PMID42387251
PMCPMC13442991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.