ArticleNature medicine2026
A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of antihypertensive therapy on the risk of major cardiovascular disease across 51 randomized trials.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy reduces cardiovascular risk, but whether its proportional benefits increase with longer treatment duration remains unclear. We conducted an individual participant-level data meta-analysis of 51 randomized trials from the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (358,642 participants; median follow-up: 4.2 years). Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated time-stratified hazard ratios (HRs) for major cardiovascular events (MACE; fatal or non-fatal stroke, ischemic heart disease or heart failure) across annual follow-up intervals up to more than 5 years, standardized to a 5-mmHg systolic BP reduction. Network meta-analysis examined whether temporal patterns differed across antihypertensive drug classes. Annual MACE incidence was highest during year 1 (3.0% treatment versus 3.6% control), declined during years 1-5 and then rose at more than 5 years (3.1% versus 3.4%). BP lowering reduced MACE risk, with benefits established early and not progressively increasing over time. A 5-mmHg systolic BP reduction was associated with a 12% lower MACE risk in year 1 (HR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-0.91), with modest attenuation thereafter: HRs were 0.88 (0.85-0.92) in years 1-2, 0.94 (0.90-0.98) in years 2-3, 0.87 (0.83-0.92) in years 3-4, 0.97 (0.91-1.03) in years 4-5 and 0.94 (0.87-1.01) at more than 5 years (P for trend = 0.006). Similar patterns occurred across five drug classes. These findings indicate that the relative cardiovascular benefits of BP lowering emerge within months and do not increase over time, suggesting that prioritizing higher-risk individuals for treatment yields greater clinical utility than prolonged treatment in low-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.