ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Impact of doublet post-transplant maintenance on outcomes in multiple myeloma: A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-transplant maintenance therapy is a cornerstone of care for transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). While lenalidomide/bortezomib has been used as maintenance, clinical trials suggest that doublet maintenance may provide additional benefit, particularly in high-risk disease. Real-world evidence remains limited. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with MM who underwent single autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by maintenance therapy between 2015 and 2023. Doublet maintenance was defined as ≥2 agents and monotherapy maintenance as a single agent; dexamethasone was excluded from both definitions. The primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). To mitigate treatment allocation bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to generate a pseudopopulation of monotherapy maintenance patients with characteristics comparable to those receiving doublet therapy. A total of 410 patients were included (doublet, n = 80; monotherapy, n = 330). The most common doublet and monotherapy regimens were bortezomib-lenalidomide (n = 46, 58%) and lenalidomide (n = 159, 48%), respectively. In the PSM analysis, doublet maintenance was associated with superior EFS (HR 0.58, p = 0.022; aHR 0.48, p = 0.007) and OS (HR 0.45, p = 0.022; aHR 0.47, p = 0.029). In this real-world analysis, doublet maintenance after ASCT was associated with superior EFS and OS, supporting broader consideration of this approach in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42387202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.