Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42387195›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Machine learning algorithms in the estimation of sex from 3DCT-generated cranial and pelvic measurements.

Oladiran I Olateju, Oriasotie M Ujaddughe, Muhammad E H Chowdhury, Mubarak A Bidmos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oladiran I OlatejuDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Oriasotie M UjaddugheDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Mubarak A BidmosDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. mbidmos@qu.edu.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex estimation from skeletal remains is a key component of forensic anthropology, with the skull and pelvis being the most sexually dimorphic elements in terms of morphology. Traditional morphometric approaches, such as discriminant function and logistic regression analyses, have achieved high accuracy in estimating sex across various populations, including South Africans. However, the use of machine learning (ML) for sex estimation based on cranial and pelvic measurements has not yet been explored in any South African population. This study assessed the potential of ML algorithms to estimate sex from cranial and pelvic measurements derived from computed tomography (CT) scans of contemporary Black South Africans. The sample included 680 skeletal elements (400 crania and 280 pelvic bones) with an equal distribution of males and females. CT scans archived at the Department of Radiology, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, were reconstructed into 3D models using Xiris and IntelliSpace software, from which eight cranial and eleven pelvic measurements were collected. Seven classical ML algorithms were applied and feature ranking techniques were used to determine the most informative variables for sex estimation. A stacking ML model was then developed, incorporating the top three classifiers as base learners. Their outputs were combined and passed to different ML algorithms acting as meta-learners for final classification. The findings confirmed strong sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic bones, and the stacking models achieved superior accuracy (cranium: 80.3-94.3%; pelvis: 86.1-96.1%) compared to traditional multivariate methods, demonstrating the potential of ML in forensic sex estimation.

Indexed as

CraniumForensic anthropologyMachine learning algorithmsPelvic boneSex estimation

Identifiers

PMID42387195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.