Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42387144›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Diagnostic value of an S1-normalized CT hounsfield unit ratio for identifying acute fractures in complex thoracolumbar osteoporotic deformities.

Bangjun Wen, Zhiyun Feng, Shutong Yang, Daolin Xia, Aiguo Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bangjun Wen *Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhiyun Feng *Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shutong YangNanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Daolin XiaXuyi people's Hospital, Huaian, China.
Aiguo GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, China. gaoaiguo899@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, multivertebral deformities, previous vertebral fractures, adjacent vertebral augmentation, or continuous multivertebral acute fractures may make the conventional adjacent-vertebra reference unreliable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of an S1-normalized CT Hounsfield unit ratio (S1-ratio), which does not rely on adjacent vertebrae, for identifying MRI-confirmed acute fractured vertebrae in complex thoracolumbar osteoporotic deformities.

methodsThis single-center retrospective diagnostic accuracy study included female patients who presented between January 2024 and June 2025 with low-energy T11-L5 vertebral fractures or suspected osteoporotic vertebral deformities and had complete imaging data. Target vertebrae were identified by three radiologists based on CT morphological abnormalities while blinded to MRI bone marrow edema findings; disagreements were resolved by consensus. Corresponding bone marrow edema on MRI STIR or fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences was used as the reference standard for acute fracture. The target vertebrae and S1 vertebral body were measured on axial CT images using cancellous bone regions of interest at upper, middle, and lower levels. The mean target vertebral HU (VB-HU), S1-HU, and S1-ratio (VB-HU/S1-HU) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression was used to account for within-patient correlation caused by multiple target vertebrae per patient, and vertebral region was further included to assess the effect of uneven segmental distribution.

resultsA total of 91 female patients and 217 target vertebrae were included, comprising 100 acute fractured vertebrae and 117 chronic deformity vertebrae. VB-HU (170.51 ± 48.43 vs. 75.39 ± 32.83, P < 0.001) and S1-ratio (1.47 ± 0.53 vs. 0.66 ± 0.23, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in acute fractured vertebrae than in chronic deformity vertebrae. The AUC of S1-ratio for identifying acute fractured vertebrae was 0.968 (95% CI 0.949-0.987, P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff was 0.948, with a sensitivity of 92.0%, specificity of 89.7%, accuracy of 90.8%, positive predictive value of 88.5%, and negative predictive value of 92.9%. GEE analysis showed that each 0.1 increase in S1-ratio was associated with a 2.63-fold increase in the odds of acute fracture (95% CI 2.07-3.36, P < 0.001). After further adjustment for vertebral region, the association remained significant (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.93-3.22, P < 0.001). S1-HU was negatively correlated with age (rho = -0.467, P < 0.001) and positively correlated with multiple DXA T-scores. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for VB-HU, S1-HU, and S1-ratio was good to excellent (ICC = 0.878-0.967).

conclusionS1-ratio is a simple, calculable, and non-adjacent-vertebra-dependent CT quantitative metric that may assist in identifying MRI-confirmed acute fractured vertebrae in complex osteoporotic vertebral deformities. Its diagnostic performance remained stable after accounting for within-patient correlation and uneven vertebral-region distribution, particularly in clinical scenarios where adjacent vertebrae are unsuitable references because of chronic deformity, percutaneous kyphoplasty/percutaneous vertebroplasty (PKP/PVP), instrumentation, or continuous multivertebral fractures.

Indexed as

Acute fractureChronic deformityComputed tomographyHounsfield unitOsteoporotic vertebral fractureS1-HUS1-ratio

Identifiers

PMID42387144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.