ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatiotemporal differentiation and trade-off/synergy relationships of ecosystem service values in Mountain-Oasis-Desert System of Xinjiang Aksu region.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how land use/cover change (LUCC) mediates the interactions among ecosystem services (ES) is crucial for sustaining fragile landscapes worldwide. This study addresses this challenge in the arid Mountain-Oasis-Desert System (MODS), a coupled socio-ecological complex where water-limited environments intensify human-nature conflicts. Taking the Aksu MODS as a typical case, we developed an integrated assessment framework combining a locally calibrated Ecosystem Service Value (ESV) model with the biophysical InVEST model (for carbon storage, habitat quality, and water yield) to analyze ES dynamics and their trade-offs/synergies from 1990 to 2020. Results revealed a dramatic LUCC, with cultivated and construction land expanding by 83.06% and 93.19%, respectively, at the expense of grassland and water areas. Consequently, total ESV declined markedly, exhibiting increasing spatial heterogeneity. A fundamental subsystem divergence emerged: while synergistic relationships dominated in mountain and desert areas, the human-dominated oasis became a hotspot of trade-offs, with 81.82% of ES pairs showing significant trade-offs, particularly between food production and water-related regulation. InVEST modeling corroborated this pattern, indicating stable total carbon storage (~ 4.0 × 10⁹ t) but a severe decline in water yield (from 1.82 × 10⁶ mm to 0.86 × 10⁶ mm), with grassland degradation serving as a key proximate mechanism. Our findings demonstrate that ES interactions are not uniform but are fundamentally shaped by subsystem-specific LUCC trajectories. This underscores the imperative of spatially differentiated management to mitigate trade-offs in vulnerable arid landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.