ReviewEuropean radiology2026
ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.
Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perianal Fistulae Medical Imaging Maps: A Pictorial Diagnostic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common and underdiagnosed condition affecting urinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual function. Imaging plays a pivotal role in diagnosis and treatment planning, yet approaches to technique, interpretation, and reporting remain inconsistent. This article, authored by members of the ESUR Pelvic Floor Working Group, provides practical recommendations for the use of fluoroscopic defecography, MR defecography, and pelvic floor ultrasound, including standardized protocols, key measurements, and a structured, compartment-based interpretation strategy. We detail the imaging features of anterior, middle, and posterior compartment disorders and highlight common pitfalls. Implementing these recommendations by adopting the suggested protocols and reporting approach in routine practice will help ensure consistent, clinically relevant pelvic floor assessments. KEY POINTS: Pelvic floor dysfunction frequently involves multiple compartments, and MRI provides a detailed structural and functional assessment of all pelvic compartments. Fluoroscopic defecography remains the mainstay for the evaluation of defecatory disorders. Pelvic floor ultrasound is increasingly valuable for triaging pelvic floor dysfunction and for detailed assessment of pelvic floor anatomy and anal sphincter integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42386984What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.