Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42386984›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2026

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Mohamed A Abdelatty, Aleksandra Stankiewicz, Francesca Maccioni, Rebeca Mirón Mombiela, Basma Amer, Sandra Sousa, Sonya Snape, Carlos Carnelli, Rita Lucas, Geertje Balk-Roos and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohamed A AbdelattyPelvic Floor Imaging Unit and Research Lab, Department of Radiology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. mohamed.a.abdelatty@cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-4657
Aleksandra StankiewiczDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Francesca MaccioniDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Rebeca Mirón MombielaDepartment of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Basma AmerPelvic Floor Imaging Unit and Research Lab, Department of Radiology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sandra SousaRadiology Department, Hospital Lusíadas Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Sonya SnapeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Dorset, Dorset, UK.
Carlos CarnelliDepartment of Radiology, Asistencial Médica de Maldonado, Punta del Este, Uruguay.
Rita LucasRadiology Department, Hospital Lusíadas Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Geertje Balk-RoosDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland.
Andelib BabatürkDepartment of Radiology, Ankara Güven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Rania F El SayedPelvic Floor Imaging Unit and Research Lab, Department of Radiology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common and underdiagnosed condition affecting urinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual function. Imaging plays a pivotal role in diagnosis and treatment planning, yet approaches to technique, interpretation, and reporting remain inconsistent. This article, authored by members of the ESUR Pelvic Floor Working Group, provides practical recommendations for the use of fluoroscopic defecography, MR defecography, and pelvic floor ultrasound, including standardized protocols, key measurements, and a structured, compartment-based interpretation strategy. We detail the imaging features of anterior, middle, and posterior compartment disorders and highlight common pitfalls. Implementing these recommendations by adopting the suggested protocols and reporting approach in routine practice will help ensure consistent, clinically relevant pelvic floor assessments. KEY POINTS: Pelvic floor dysfunction frequently involves multiple compartments, and MRI provides a detailed structural and functional assessment of all pelvic compartments. Fluoroscopic defecography remains the mainstay for the evaluation of defecatory disorders. Pelvic floor ultrasound is increasingly valuable for triaging pelvic floor dysfunction and for detailed assessment of pelvic floor anatomy and anal sphincter integrity.

Indexed as

FluoroscopyMagnetic resonance imagingPelvic floor disorders, DefecographyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42386984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.