ArticleNature genetics2026
Improved heritability partitioning and enrichment analyses using summary statistics with graphREML.
Article in Nature genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heritability enrichment analysis using data from genome-wide association studies is often used to understand the functional basis of genetic architecture. Stratified linkage disequilibrium score regression (S-LDSC) is a widely used method-of-moments estimator for heritability enrichment, but S-LDSC has low statistical power compared with likelihood-based approaches. We introduce graphREML, a precise and powerful likelihood-based heritability partitioning and enrichment analysis method. It utilizes summary statistics from genome-wide association studies and sparse linkage disequilibrium graphical models, which make likelihood calculations tractable. We validate our method using extensive simulations and in analyses of a wide range of real traits. On average across traits, graphREML produces enrichment estimates that are concordant with S-LDSC, indicating that both methods are unbiased; however, graphREML identifies 2.5 times more significant trait-annotation enrichments, demonstrating greater power compared with the moment-based S-LDSC approach. Furthermore, graphREML flexibly models the relationship between the annotations of an SNP and its heritability, producing well-calibrated estimates of per-SNP heritability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42386933What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.